VVD Europarty on-line
WRITTEN QUESTION P-0397/02
by Elly Plooij-van Gorsel (ELDR) to the Commission
06 February 2002
Subject: Shutting down of the high-flux
reactor at Petten, the Netherlands
Is the Commission aware of the safety problems
which have resulted in the high-flux reactor in Petten being temporarily
shut down?
Is it aware of the failure to comply with the
requisite safety provisions? If so, what does the Commission intend doing
in order to guarantee optimum safety in the future?
Is there a danger that Europe will run short
of radioisotopes now that the reactor has been shut down? If so, how does
the Commission intend to ensure that cancer patients who are dependent
on Petten will receive proper treatment?
Original language of question: NL
Question not yet published in the OJ
P-0397/02EN
Answer given by Mr Busquin
on behalf of the Commission
(12 March 2002)
On 1 February 2002 a local newspaper article highlighted the existence
of a "crack" (in fact an internal welding anomaly) in the High
Flux Reactor (HFR). This has existed since the current reactor vessel
was installed in 1984. It has been fully documented to the regulatory
authorities. The "crack" has been monitored and measured continually
over the years during "In Service Inspection", and in August
2001 the results of an inspection and measurement of this internal "crack"
led to public concern that the "crack" might have grown. The
scientific experts who carried out the tests and the Nuclear Research
and Consultancy Group (NRG) indicated that the apparent growth was explained
by a change of instrument used in the measurement and that it posed no
danger to safety. After discussion and review of the technical details
of the measurements, the Dutch Safety Authorities (KFD-Kern Fysische Dienst)
allowed the reactor to continue operation but requested a further inspection
in summer 2002.
In response to allegations made in 2001 by
a staff member of NRG, the Dutch company operating the HFR, the Dutch
licensing authority launched an investigation into the safety and the
functioning of the High Flux Reactor. The Commission as a license holder
fully co-operated in this investigation. The investigation concluded that
while the High Flux Reactor management had fully respected the license
conditions, there had been inconsistencies between the operating instructions
and the technical safety specifications applied by NRG, leading to different
interpretations of how to apply some procedures. In the light of the above,
the Commission expressed to the Dutch authorities and NRG the view that
improvements in the safety culture of the HFR operation were possible
and desirable.
At the request of the Joint Research Center
(JRC), the International Atomic Energy Agency of Vienna (IAEA) has accepted
to perform an audit on the safety culture. The audit has started on 13
February 2002. The expert panel of the IAEA, conducting this audit, will
report directly to the Commission through the Institute of Energy of the
JRC.
In the light of the latest developments, the
Commission has recommended that the reactor be shut down temporarily to
permit re-measurement of the 'crack' (the internal welding anomaly). The
shutdown period will also be used to accelerate the implementation of
training and other measures to enhance the safety culture.
In agreement with the KFD, it has been decided
to keep the HFR in operation until the end of the current cycle (18 February
2002) in order to minimise the risk of disruption to the short term supply
of medical radioisotopes used for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
This should allow radioisotope producers to find alternative supplies.
In that context, the Commission welcomes the meeting of the European radioisotopes
producers and European research reactors association foreseen in the coming
days to negotiate contingency schedules with reactor operators for the
period February and March 2002.
|